I can’t write a lot about this just yet… too much studying to do, learning about the ways of politics, agribusiness, deceit (aka “framing the discussion”). But I want to put something down here.
Introduced last month into the US House of Representatives is a new bill, H.R. 875: Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 , that has been carefully designed NOT to enhance food safety per se, but to ensure the long-term dominance of agribusiness at the expense of small farmers.
This bill was introduced by a Democrat and is co-sponsored by 39 Democrats (unfortunately including my own, Rep. Mark Schauer, 7th District Michigan). I’m glad that Republicans are standing, so far, against this. What I’d like is for Democrats AND Republicans who care about health, food and the freedom to choose will take a stand against this and make their voices heard.
What’s HR 875 about? HR 875 first charges that the FDA is inadequate to the task of protecting our food supply proactively… not enough inspectors, hamstrung by antiquated legislation, yada yada. Next it proposes a new Food Safety Administration within… well, let’s let the bill speak for itself:
Purpose: To establish the Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes.
That doesn’t sound so bad, does it? Who could be against safe food? Nobody. But this isn’t really about safe food… it’s about large-scale, factory-farm agribusiness coming under fire for endangering public safety. Think about it… every food safety issue you can think of has involved large-scale factory farms and agribusiness, not small farms and organic farms and folks who care sincerely about delivering healthy fresh food to you. There’s no major E. coli or salmonella outbreaks coming from farmer’s markets in this country.
What’s wrong with HR 875? I’ll take a first shot at it, but I’ll come back to visit the topic more in the future, because it’s that important.
Since agribusiness knows the situation for them is bad and that legislation could be introduced to penalize them for their sorry ways, what do they do? Well, if your CEO $$$ bonuses were on the line and stock options were underwater, you’d come up with a way to turn the situation on its head. And that’s what HR 875 does. It says “Hey, we need to protect your food from the farmer’s field to your table, and we can only do that with more regulations and unscheduled government inspection and animal surveillance, with mandatory food safety plans approved by the government, including minimum standards for fertilizer use, hygiene, and packaging.” These things might sound reasonable if you live in town and buy your food from a supermarket. But not if you’re a small farmer just trying to scrape by, which is about all that small farmers can manage to do, usually with the help of some outside income.
In short, make regulations that put an administrative burden on ALL farms regardless of size. If you sell food to consumers, you must comply. That makes some sense in a Big Brother, We Know What’s Best For You kind of way. But let me give you an example of what this means.
A farm, of any size, is called a “food production facility” (as opposed to a slaughterhouse, which is called a “food establishment”). Section 206 of HR 875 states that the government has the right and responsibility to visit and inspect the facility, approve the food safety plan, review food safety records, conduct monitoring and surveillance of animals and plants, and more. It goes on to establish that the government has the right to have access to and ability to copy ALL records (paper and electronic) necessary to determine whether the food is in compliance with food safety laws, and to track the food in commerce.
Hmmm? To “track the food in commerce”. Paul, I don’t see your records as to tracking your food in commerce. Wha? I deliver eggs and produce to a farmer’s market in Ann Arbor and make a few special deliveries door to door. I sell a few eggs from my back door. I need to track this?
A few years down the line, the regulations change… I need to what? Use bar codes to track my tomatoes? I need to use RFID tags on any lots larger than 10 pounds?
OK, could I be jumping the gun on this? Could I be paranoid that maybe big business really doesn’t have it’s own best interests at heart, and it’s really concerned first and foremost about the safety of our people?
No. I’m right. They know what they’re doing. Who? THEY. This is the biotechnology lobby, that got former Iowa Gov Tom Vilsack into the Department of Agriculture Secretary position (Vilsack champions GMO products and was selected “Governor of the Year” by the BIO, Biotechnology Industry Organization). This is Monsanto, whose strategic consultant Stanley Greenberg is the husband of US Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn, who introduced HR 875 in February.
This is the dirty tail wagging the food safety dog. This is going beyond overkill to create overlords.
(sigh. breathe. focus.)
There is a Variance. In this bill! You’d hope that there would be a Variance, a loophole, something that would allow those with a legitimate need to skip the more onerous parts of this bill, and just get their jobs done. And there is! Right there in section 206, right after the hard parts about the bill’s burden of inspection, surveillance and seizing of records…comes this welcome relief:
States and foreign countries that export produce intended for consumption in the United States may request from the Administrator variances from the requirements of the regulations under subsection (c).
That’s right… not small farms. FOREIGN farms. All they have to do is write a request to the Administrator describing their practices, have their request reviewed, and get a variance. No inspection. No surveillance. Just ask and it shall be given unto you. So… all you have to do is get yourself a foreign farm, and put a few containerized freight carbon miles on your produce, and everything is fine again.
( breathe. )
I’m going to quit this post now. I’m going to think about it some more, read some more, and probably write some more. I’ll consider writing about it as if there is no complicity, no devious big agribusiness plot to come out ahead by writing food safety legislation their way. Perhaps I’ll convince myself that this bill is well-intentioned, but simply has too many unintended consequences for small farmers, for organic farmers, for reducing the food choices of all Americans, and ultimately the food safety of all Americans. I’ll save that for tomorrow.
Meanwhile, every Representative in Congress who will vote on this bill needs to know what the small farmers in their districts think of this bill, what every person who cares about the food that goes onto their plates thinks about this bill. It’s about choices. Where is that Farmer in Chief anyway? It sounds like Michelle might be getting the picture, with her new vegetable garden coming today. As long as they don’t try and sell any of the produce without keeping tracking records. No vegetable market stand on the White House lawn for those Obama children, not after HR 875 passes, or at least not without a White House staffer to record and track that produce.